Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying Non Surgical Scoliosis Treatment at FixScoliosis.com but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Measurements

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Lititz, Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    990
    Country
    Users Country Flag
    Blog Entries
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldfinch View Post
    You make a good case to other members of your profession that they shouldn't solely rely on Cobb Angle measurement. I hope they take note.
    I'm fairly certain many of the orthopedic doctors in the US are basing treatment decisions (observation, bracing, and possibly even surgery) solely off cobb's angle, as well as many chiropractors.

    I'm searching for the scoliosis treatment of the future!
    Toll-Free 1-866-627-3009

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    56
    Country
    Users Country Flag

    Default

    We certainly have plenty of common ground here I certainly agree that Cobb Angle measurement is "incomplete" on its own, and that working out new methods for the assessment and measurement of scoliotic curves is to be applauded.

    Having spoken to my medical colleagues, I'm informed that any surgeon who decided on treatment for a scoliotic patient based purely on the Cobb Angle as read from an x-ray would be negligent in the extreme, especially if they proceeded to surgery. No respectable scoliosis consultant would do this; in fact, it's nigh on impossible, because scoliosis is a three dimensional deformity and bracing and surgery cannot be carried out based on one two dimensional measurement. Restoring sagittal and coronal balance is vitally important, thus a variety of factors and measurements are looked at together in context.

    If you know that there are surgeons who make surgical decisions based solely on the Cobb, it might be a good idea to get your article more widely published so that the medics can see it too? It's something that should be brought to light. I know you're seeking to treat patients non-surgically here and obviously I applaud that as it is something I would like to see happen more, however I feel I must advise that any patients who go down the traditional medical route should ensure that they seek a consultant who is a member of the Scoliosis Research Society; there is no way an SRS surgeon would work based on just a Cobb Angle.

    Well done for highlighting this issue, it's educational for all.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Lititz, Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    990
    Country
    Users Country Flag
    Blog Entries
    113

    Question Miscommunication again?

    Hi Goldfinch,

    I think we got off the same page again. I'm not saying that any orthos in the US are performing surgery based solely on Cobb angle (and for all the NSF readers....I was intentionally using the term "Cobb's angle" to reinforce that it is simply one man's interpretation of how scoliosis should be measured). I'm suggesting that some orthos may be making the initial recommendation for surgery solely based off Cobb angle.

    I am not trying to suggest that anybody is acting in an unprofessional or unethical manner.

    I'm searching for the scoliosis treatment of the future!
    Toll-Free 1-866-627-3009

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •